Sutter Health Reaches $228 Million Settlement in Antitrust Case

Key Takeaways

• $228 Million Settlement: Sutter Health has agreed to settle an antitrust lawsuit for $228 million, resolving allegations that it inflated healthcare premiums by restricting patient access to lower-cost hospitals.
• Long-Running Legal Battle: The case, filed in 2012 by over 3 million small businesses and individuals, claims Sutter used its market power to force health plans into anti-competitive contracts.
• Appeals and Trial: While Sutter won a 2022 jury trial, a federal appeals court revived the case, and a retrial had been set for this spring before the settlement was reached.
• Plaintiffs' Legal Fees: The plaintiffs' attorneys are seeking up to 33% of the settlement fund, roughly $76 million, for legal fees.
• Previous Settlements: Sutter Health has faced other significant settlements, including a $575 million agreement in 2021 over similar allegations.

Deep Dive

After years of legal battles, Sutter Health has agreed to pay $228 million to settle a class action lawsuit that accused the health system of artificially inflating insurance premiums and limiting consumer choice in Northern California. The settlement marks a significant chapter in a case that’s been ongoing since 2012, with implications not only for Sutter but also for the broader healthcare landscape.

The lawsuit, filed by a class of more than 3 million small businesses and individuals, claimed that Sutter Health used its market power to force health insurance plans into restrictive contracts. These contracts prevented insurers from directing patients to lower-cost, non-Sutter hospitals, effectively driving up healthcare costs. Plaintiffs argued that this anti-competitive behavior lasted for decades, from the 1990s to 2020.

In 2022, after a four-week jury trial, a federal court ruled in favor of Sutter, but the plaintiffs didn’t give up. A U.S. federal appeals court revived the case last year, and a retrial had been scheduled for this spring. Now, after a joint decision by both parties, Sutter Health has agreed to settle—though it continues to deny any wrongdoing.

“While the settlement resolves this matter, it doesn’t change the fact that Sutter has always acted in good faith in its business practices,” the company said in a statement. The plaintiffs, on the other hand, called the settlement “what’s best for the parties, for patients, and for the class.”

The $228 million settlement fund will be split among the plaintiffs, with the plaintiffs' lawyers expected to request up to 33% of the fund, or around $76 million, for legal fees. The settlement also provides closure for a case that has lingered in the courts for over a decade.

Sutter Health is one of the largest health systems in the U.S., operating dozens of hospitals and clinics throughout Northern California. Despite the legal challenges, the company posted $18 billion in revenue last year. Sutter has also been no stranger to settlements in recent years, including a $575 million settlement in 2021 over similar allegations with the state of California and labor unions.

The resolution of this case is a reminder of the complexities in the U.S. healthcare market, where anti-competitive practices and high costs often intersect. For consumers, the question remains whether settlements like this one can prompt lasting change in how hospitals and insurers operate. For Sutter, the settlement offers a chance to move forward, but the shadow of this long-running legal saga will likely continue to influence its reputation.

The GRC Report is your premier destination for the latest in governance, risk, and compliance news. As your reliable source for comprehensive coverage, we ensure you stay informed and ready to navigate the dynamic landscape of GRC. Beyond being a news source, the GRC Report represents a thriving community of professionals who, like you, are dedicated to GRC excellence. Explore our insightful articles and breaking news, and actively participate in the conversation to enhance your GRC journey.