Regulating the Future: America’s AI Plan
Key Takeaways
- Deregulation with Funding: America’s AI plan, “America’s Winning the Race: America's AI Action Plan," encourages agencies to roll back existing AI-related regulations and encourages states to do the same by making funding contingent on deregulation.
- Global Trade: The U.S. will increase AI exports to allied countries and impose tighter restrictions on AI technology and parts to competitors, potentially complicating the landscape of global compliance for businesses and companies.
- Workforce Reinforcement: The Plan also aims to stimulate more AI learning through incentives for training, internships, and apprenticeships, increasing opportunities for businesses to recruit and develop their own AI talent, especially in states aligned with federal policy.
- Compliance Complication: With changes happening on both the state and federal levels, businesses are going to need to be extra vigilant, with those engaging in international trade having to keep a closer eye.
Deep Dive
These past few months have seen AI’s explosion into the market, transforming how many businesses, companies, and even everyday consumers function on a daily basis. AI has even made its way into many governments and offices of CEOs, with many investing time and resources into furthering its function and abilities, all while trying to make sense of the rapidly evolving technology. Despite minimal conversation surrounding its debut, risk and compliance have now become a larger talking point, with officials taking notice.
With the landscape of regulation differing from country to country, one thing is consistent, AI is rapidly evolving, and there are no signs of it stopping. In July, the U.S. joined the global conversation with “America’s Winning the Race: America's AI Action Plan.” The Plan details a comprehensive federal roadmap outlining more than 90 policy actions designed to accelerate U.S. leadership in AI through innovation, infrastructure, and international diplomacy/security, aimed at fostering unprecedented AI implementation and growth.
Foundational Pillars of America’s AI Action Plan
This Plan centers on four core pillars:
- Accelerate AI Innovation: Through comprehensive regulatory reform aimed at eliminating obstacles and expanding access to AI computing capacity, the government hopes to support open-source AI initiatives. In addition to offering incentives for private R&D, there is also a push for accelerating the integration of AI in priority sectors such as defense, healthcare, and manufacturing.
- Build American AI Infrastructure: The Plan also calls for prioritizing the swift development and modernization of essential infrastructure, including data centers, semiconductor manufacturing, advanced technologies, and federal assets to support AI progress.
- Lead in International AI Diplomacy and Security: There is also an emphasis on the importance of safeguarding U.S. AI assets against foreign misuse and intellectual property theft, implementing strategic export controls, and spearheading global initiatives to foster AI cooperation among allied nations.
- Bolstering the Workforce and Talent Pool: The Plan underscores the importance of expanding the nation’s AI-skilled workforce across all sectors. Federal agencies are tasked with funding AI-focused education and training programs, increasing apprenticeship opportunities, and supporting initiatives that help workers transition into AI-related roles.
The Plan points to both new opportunities and emerging complexities, requiring close attention to shifting state and federal requirements, changes in export controls, and potential new standards on issues like synthetic media and open-source adoption. As agencies move forward in turning this roadmap into specific policies and incentives, organizations that stay informed and ready to adapt will be best equipped to compete and manage risk in the evolving world of AI.
Challenges Facing AI’s Implementation
The U.S.’s ambition to lead in AI innovation is clear, but major challenges still stand in the way. As many experts have warned, several critical obstacles could threaten the effective and ethical deployment of AI across the country:
- Outdated IT Systems: As many countries look to implement AI in public services, concerns about legacy systems' insufficient capabilities for modern AI applications have heightened caution. These outdated infrastructures could create bottlenecks, slowing the process and limiting the effectiveness of public services.
- Inconsistent and Low-Quality Data: The performance of AI models depends heavily on the quality of their training data. When data is incomplete, outdated, or inconsistent across departments, it can result in flawed AI-driven decisions and introduce unintended biases into AI applications.
- Regulatory Uncertainty: Although the U.S.’s regulatory framework is designed to be flexible, some industry leaders worry that the absence of clear, specific rules could cause confusion and lead to inconsistent enforcement across sectors.
Copyright Clash
Beyond regulatory and technological hurdles, proposed revisions to copyright laws aimed at supporting AI research have met strong opposition from creative sectors. Critics warn that such changes could inadvertently weaken intellectual property protections, reducing incentives for creative production and innovation. Industries such as publishing, entertainment, and luxury goods fear that looser copyright rules may enable the unauthorized use and commercialization of protected works by AI developers, underscoring the ethical challenge of balancing rapid innovation with safeguarding creators’ rights.
AI models require extensive training on large data sets. However, without proper oversight, it scrapes text, images, and other creative works from publicly available sources. Without strict regulations, content creators are at risk of having their work used without their permission or compensation. This has prompted calls for tighter regulations that would require AI developers to secure explicit permission before using copyrighted materials for training purposes.
Furthermore, America’s AI strategy identifies “synthetic media,” AI-created images, audio, and video capable of deceiving, impersonating, or committing fraud, as a significant risk area. For instance, an AI-generated video could realistically replicate a CEO’s appearance and voice to issue fake corporate announcements or financial forecasts, potentially influencing markets or harming reputations before the deception is uncovered. The Plan tasks federal agencies with creating new standards to counter these threats, though the specific requirements of those standards have yet to be defined.
AI Regulation Revamped
To effectively incorporate ethics into AI innovation, both the U.S. government and businesses must adopt a proactive, principle-driven approach. The recommended guiding principles, informed by established frameworks like the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Principles on AI, include:
- Human-centric design: AI should seek to work with, not against, human capabilities. Prioritizing ethical considerations from the initial design phase and ensuring AI applications serve societal needs rather than purely commercial interests are ways to keep AI from undermining individual rights, privacy, and autonomy.
- Inclusive innovation: Ensure that AI development avoids reinforcing existing biases or inequalities by prioritizing diverse training data and guaranteeing equitable access to its benefits across all demographic groups.
- Continuous ethical assessment: Conduct regular reviews of AI applications to quickly detect and address ethical risks.
- Collaborative oversight: Establish independent ethics committees or watchdogs involving diverse stakeholders, including academia, civil society, and affected communities.
- Transparency and accountability: Provide clear documentation of an AI system’s functions, decision-making processes, and potential impacts to ensure accountability and foster public trust.
The Future of Regulation
Integrating these principles into AI strategies enables the U.S. to promote innovation that is sustainable, ethically grounded, socially responsible, and economically beneficial. Nonetheless, striking the right balance between these ethical considerations and other priorities, such as rapid development and system reliability, will be a complex challenge that unfolds in the months and years ahead. Policymakers must stay flexible, allowing regulations to adapt in step with technological progress and evolving ethical concerns. At the same time, to stay on the cutting edge, countries should actively participate in international discussions on AI governance, aligning their frameworks with global norms to support cross-border cooperation and trade.
As AI increasingly influences industries and everyday life, the U.S.’s regulatory approach will play a pivotal role in maintaining both global competitiveness and ethical integrity. The near future will be crucial in shaping how effectively nations can harmonize innovation with responsible oversight, ensuring AI technologies serve the broader public good.
The GRC Report is your premier destination for the latest in governance, risk, and compliance news. As your reliable source for comprehensive coverage, we ensure you stay informed and ready to navigate the dynamic landscape of GRC. Beyond being a news source, the GRC Report represents a thriving community of professionals who, like you, are dedicated to GRC excellence. Explore our insightful articles and breaking news, and actively participate in the conversation to enhance your GRC journey.