Rethinking SaaS Resilience in the Financial Services Supply Chain

Key Takeaways

• JPMorgan Chase’s Warning: The bank’s CISO publicly urged SaaS providers to strengthen operational resilience, raising the bar for financial services vendors.
• Limits of Annual Certifications: ISO 27001 and SOC 2 remain important but can’t prove a provider’s ability to withstand real-world disruptions.
• Shift to Continuous Assurance: Leading vendors are offering deployment flexibility, live service health transparency, and ongoing resilience testing.
• Regulatory Push: NIS2, DORA, and SEC cybersecurity rules are making resilience a compliance requirement as well as a market differentiator.

Deep Dive

When JPMorgan Chase’s CISO took to the stage earlier this year and called on SaaS providers to “do better” on resilience, it wasn’t just another passing soundbite. It was a rare public signal from one of the most security-mature organizations on the planet.

Between geopolitical tensions disrupting supply chains, increasingly sophisticated cyberattacks, and regulators tightening operational resilience rules, the tolerance for “good enough” in SaaS has all but evaporated. Financial services firms, arguably the most demanding and highly regulated customers in the world, are now scrutinizing SaaS vendors not just on their features, uptime, or certifications, but on how they’ll keep the lights on when the unpredictable becomes reality.

For years, SaaS providers could point to an ISO 27001 certificate, a SOC 2 report, and a clean annual audit as proof of their reliability. And in fairness, those frameworks still matter, they’re the baseline for security and governance. But they were never designed to tell the whole resilience story.

A certificate can’t tell you whether a provider has the ability to fail over critical services to another geography in hours, not days. It can’t show how quickly they could rebuild infrastructure if a cloud provider suffers a catastrophic outage. And it certainly can’t reveal whether the vendor has the contractual and operational muscle to manage its own third-party dependencies without leaving customers in the dark.

In other words: annual assurance might prove that your vendor’s controls exist, but it won’t tell you whether those controls will stand up to the pressure cooker of a real-world crisis.

The Shift Toward Continuous, Transparent Resilience

The providers that are starting to separate themselves from the pack are embracing a different model, one that is built on continuous assurance, deployment flexibility, and radical transparency.

• Deployment flexibility isn’t just a nice-to-have anymore. Financial firms are increasingly asking for hybrid, multi-cloud, or even on-premises deployment models to avoid single points of failure. This can also be a hedge against geopolitical risk, regulatory data localization requirements, or concentrated reliance on one hyperscaler.
• Continuous resilience testing is replacing the once-a-year disaster recovery exercise. Leading providers are running real-time failover drills, simulating supply-chain disruptions, and measuring their ability to restore operations within tight timeframes.
• Transparent, ongoing reporting is becoming a market differentiator. SaaS vendors are starting to offer customers access to live service health dashboards, real-time incident updates, and visibility into dependency performance, the kind of information that used to be locked behind quarterly review meetings.

This approach is more than a technical pivot but a cultural one. It treats resilience as a shared responsibility between vendor and client, where trust is built not on an annual audit PDF but on a living, breathing operational partnership.

Where Regulation Meets Market Reality

Regulators are increasingly validating this direction. The EU’s NIS2 Directive and DORA (Digital Operational Resilience Act) both call for continuous monitoring, strong supply-chain governance, and rapid incident disclosure. In the US, the SEC’s cybersecurity rules are pushing publicly traded companies to demonstrate not just security, but operational continuity in the face of disruption.

The writing is on the wall that resilience is becoming a compliance obligation, not just a competitive edge. But the organizations that treat it only as a compliance checkbox will likely miss the bigger opportunity, to turn resilience into a trust signal for clients, investors, and the market.

For GRC leaders in financial services, this is the moment to recalibrate how you assess and manage SaaS vendors. That means:

• Rewriting due diligence questionnaires to probe for ongoing resilience practices, not just static certifications.
• Structuring contracts to require continuous status reporting and post-incident reviews, with clear remedies for lapses.
• Building resilience criteria into procurement scoring, so that vendors who can demonstrate adaptability and transparency get rewarded in the buying process.
• Pushing for joint exercises and tabletop scenarios that include both your organization and your critical SaaS providers to test coordinated response.

The point isn’t to create more paperwork. It’s to move resilience from a static document into a living capability, tested and visible year-round.

Resilience as a Relationship

At its core, this shift is about reframing the customer–vendor relationship. In an always-on, always-changing risk landscape, resilience can’t be something the vendor “delivers” and the customer passively “receives.” It has to be a collaborative process, with both sides invested in keeping critical services running no matter what the headlines bring.

For SaaS providers, that means opening the blinds and letting customers see the operational realities, even when it’s uncomfortable. For customers, it means being clear about expectations, sharing risk scenarios, and investing the time to understand how a vendor’s resilience posture aligns with their own.

In a world where trust is currency, the vendors who can show, not just tell, how they’ll withstand disruption won’t just pass the audit, they’ll win the market.

The GRC Report is your premier destination for the latest in governance, risk, and compliance news. As your reliable source for comprehensive coverage, we ensure you stay informed and ready to navigate the dynamic landscape of GRC. Beyond being a news source, the GRC Report represents a thriving community of professionals who, like you, are dedicated to GRC excellence. Explore our insightful articles and breaking news, and actively participate in the conversation to enhance your GRC journey.