The TPRM Wake-Up Call: Why 2025 Demands Excellence and Investment Despite Uncertain Returns

Key Takeaways

• Third-Party Exposure: Nearly half of fintech breaches and 96% of S&P 500 companies’ data breaches involve third-party risks.
• Excellence in TPRM: Success requires strategic risk thinkers with technical mastery, regulatory awareness, and GenAI integration.
• ROI Paradox: TPRM’s value is hard to quantify since its impact lies in preventing disasters that never occur.
• Why Invest Anyway: Regulatory mandates, catastrophic loss prevention, and stakeholder confidence make TPRM excellence critical despite uncertain returns.

Deep Dive

“We Live In a world where vendor-related incidents can destroy companies overnight.”

The numbers don’t lie. 96% of S&P 500 companies have experienced data breaches. 41.8% of fintech breaches can be traced back to third-party vendors. 68% of UK fintechs report rising fraud cases, with losses reaching as much as £5 million.

These aren’t isolated incidents; they are symptoms of a systemic issue. As organizations become more reliant on third-party ecosystems, the costs of insufficient Third-Party Risk Management (TPRM) have never been greater.

The Harsh Reality of Today’s Risk Landscape

Recent research from Tech Monitor reveals alarming vulnerabilities across industries. The Cybernews Business Digital Index found that only 6.19% of S&P 500 companies earned an “A” rating for cybersecurity, while 48.66% received a “D” and 40.41% scored an “F.” Manufacturing led the failures, with 52.9% receiving failing grades, closely followed by the Finance and Insurance sectors.

The fintech sector, despite achieving the highest security scores with a median of 90, still faces significant exposure to third parties. According to Tech Monitor’s coverage of SecurityScorecard’s research, third and fourth-party exposures account for 53.7% of all fintech breaches, with 63.9% linked to technology products and services such as file transfer software and cloud platforms.

Additionally, Tech Monitor reports that 68% of UK fintech companies saw an increase in fraud cases over the past year, with nearly two in five firms reporting losses between £1 million and £5 million, according to findings from the identity and fraud prevention platform Alloy.

What Excellence in TPRM Truly Demands

Stop hiring checkbox chasers; start hiring strategic risk thinkers. True TPRM excellence requires professionals who have both deep technical knowledge and strategic thinking skills. This includes the ability to leverage emerging technologies like GenAI to transform risk management from reactive assessment to predictive intelligence.

Core Technical Competencies:

• Risk Domain Mastery: Information security (CIA triad), privacy (handling PII), compliance (GDPR, HIPAA, SOX, DORA), and planning for BC/DR
• Third-Party Lifecycle Management: From pre-engagement due diligence to secure offboarding.
• Report Interpretation Skills: Capability to thoroughly analyze, rather than just skim, SOC 1/2 reports and ISO 27001 certifications.
• Regulatory Awareness: Understanding the expectations of the SEC, EBA, FFIEC, and OCC
• Platform Experience: Hands-on experience with OneTrust, ProcessUnity, RSA Archer, or similar tools
• Contract Negotiation: Proficient in subprocessor restrictions, breach notification timelines, and audit rights.
• GenAI Integration: The capability to implement and manage AI-driven risk assessment tools that analyze vendor documentation, identify risk patterns across portfolios, and generate predictive risk scoring models.

Critical Success Factors:

• Risk Prioritization: Not all risks are equal; achieving excellence means seeing through the noise.
• Cross-Functional Communication: Turning risk into actionable insights for Legal, IT, Procurement, and Business teams.
• Project Management: Managing assessments, remediation, renewals, and reporting simultaneously.
• Collaborative Leadership: Building trust between departments without formal authority.
• AI-Enhanced Decision Making: Leveraging GenAI to process vast amounts of vendor data, automate initial risk assessments, and detect emerging threat patterns that human analysts may overlook.

The Unicorn Skills: Experience in global risk management, alignment with privacy compliance, collaboration on incident response, understanding SaaS security architecture, and proficiency in AI/ML applications for risk management.

Bottom line: If your TPRM professional lacks these competencies, you’re managing spreadsheets rather than managing risk.

The Business Case Paradox: Why TPRM Investment Remains Critical Despite Uncertain ROI
Here’s the uncomfortable truth about TPRM: we’re asking organizations to make significant investments without being able to clearly quantify the return. Unlike other business functions where ROI calculations are straightforward, TPRM operates in a realm of prevented disasters that never occur, making traditional business case development nearly impossible.

The Measurement Challenge:

• How do you assess a breach that never occurred?
• What is the financial impact of maintaining vendor relationships that never encounter incidents?
• How much of a successful vendor outcome results from excellent TPRM versus mere luck?

The Investment Dilemma: Organizations face fundamental questions: How much TPRM investment is sufficient? Should we allocate $500,000 annually for vendor assessments or $2,000,000 per year? What is the difference in actual risk reduction between these investment levels?

The Attribution Problem: When TPRM-related costs occur, whether due to vendor breaches, compliance failures, or operational disruptions, it is often impossible to determine if the incident resulted from inadequate TPRM processes or was simply an unavoidable consequence of operating in today’s threat environment.

Why Invest Anyway?

Despite these measurement challenges, the case for TPRM excellence remains compelling:

1. Regulatory Reality: The U.S. SEC now holds companies accountable for supply chain cyber risks. The EU’s DORA requires stringent vendor oversight. The UK’s FCA mandates third- party governance. Non-compliance is not only risky but also costly and limits career opportunities.
2. Catastrophic Loss Prevention: Although we cannot quantify the incidents we’ve prevented, we can observe the immense costs incurred when TPRM fails. SolarWinds, Kaseya, and numerous supply chain attacks demonstrate that insufficient vendor oversight can lead to losses in the hundreds of millions.
3. Competitive Advantage: In the absence of global standards, organizations with superior TPRM capabilities achieve competitive advantages through quicker vendor onboarding, more strategic partnerships, and enhanced operational resilience.
4. Stakeholder Confidence: Investors, customers, and partners are increasingly perceiving solid TPRM as a sign of management competence and organizational maturity.

The Standards Gap: Another Reason to Invest

The current fragmented landscape, with organizations juggling ISO 27001, SOC 2, NIST, GDPR, HIPAA, and PCI DSS, creates inefficiencies and gaps that attackers exploit. Without unified global standards, organizations must over-invest in TPRM merely to navigate conflicting requirements across jurisdictions.

This standards vacuum makes internal TPRM excellence even more crucial. Organizations cannot rely solely on standardized external frameworks to guide their risk decisions; instead, they must develop advanced internal capabilities to integrate multiple compliance regimes into cohesive risk management strategies.

The Path Forward: Investing in Excellence Despite Uncertainty

The lack of clear ROI metrics does not diminish the necessity for TPRM investment; instead, it underscores the importance of strategic investment. Organizations should concentrate on:

• Building Adaptive Capabilities: Instead of over-investing in specific compliance requirements, create flexible TPRM programs that can adapt to evolving regulatory landscapes and shifting threat environments.
• Leveraging Technology: GenAI and automation can significantly enhance the efficiency of TPRM processes, enabling organizations to evaluate more vendors comprehensively without corresponding increases in staffing costs.
• Developing Internal Expertise: The shortage of qualified TPRM professionals makes internal capability development a strategic necessity. Organizations that cultivate these competencies internally achieve sustainable competitive advantages.
• Creating Learning Organizations: Implement feedback loops to enable your organization to learn from both TPRM successes and failures, gradually enhancing your capacity to make risk-informed investment decisions.

The Time to Act is Now

With 96% of major corporations experiencing breaches and nearly half of fintech incidents involving vendors, the next crisis is not a question of if, but when. Organizations that invest in TPRM excellence today, despite uncertain returns, will be better suited to face tomorrow’s inevitable challenges.

We may not be able to calculate the ROI of TPRM investment accurately, but we can determine the cost of getting it wrong. In a world where vendor-related incidents can ruin companies overnight, TPRM excellence isn’t merely an expense; it’s survival insurance.

Your turn, industry leaders. The data is clear, the uncertainty is genuine, and the time to act is now.

The GRC Report is your premier destination for the latest in governance, risk, and compliance news. As your reliable source for comprehensive coverage, we ensure you stay informed and ready to navigate the dynamic landscape of GRC. Beyond being a news source, the GRC Report represents a thriving community of professionals who, like you, are dedicated to GRC excellence. Explore our insightful articles and breaking news, and actively participate in the conversation to enhance your GRC journey.