The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) published its annual review of corporate reporting enforcement activity across the European Economic Area, offering a snapshot of how national regulators supervised financial, sustainability, and digital reporting throughout 2025, which was a year that marked a turning point for ESG disclosures in Europe.
There is a definition of risk that most organizations readily cite but far fewer truly operationalize. It comes from ISO 31000 and is echoed in frameworks developed by COSO. Risk, in its simplest and most useful form, is the effect of uncertainty on objectives.
Corporate governance has not failed because of a lack of rules. It has failed because it has lost sight of its purpose. That is the central argument of my new book, Mission Critical Governance: Focusing Management and Boards on What Matters Most, a work shaped by decades of experience and a growing recognition that modern governance systems are not delivering what boards, investors, and society now expect.
Earlier this week, I shared a brief post on social media reflecting on a question that has stayed with me throughout my career, "How can we evaluate effectiveness without first being clear about purpose?" The post pointed to a deeper issue that deserves more careful treatment. Whenever I am asked to assess effectiveness, I start in the same place. Before looking at structure, process, or performance, I ask a simple question, "What is the purpose of what I am being asked to assess?"
The Malta Financial Services Authority has set out a clearer line on what it expects from those steering Malta’s financial institutions, publishing a new General Code of Conduct for Decision Makers in the Financial Services Industry aimed squarely at governance, culture, and leadership behavior.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has issued a legal opinion declaring Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) policies unconstitutional across Texas state and local government, a move that significantly alters the compliance landscape for public institutions and potentially for private organizations operating in the state.
There is a growing problem in how applicant tracking systems are being used in hiring, and it is one that deserves more honest scrutiny. Too often, ATS platforms are treated as decision engines rather than what they actually are: administrative tools designed to support process, not replace judgment.