AMLA Board Member Outlines Joint FIU Analysis and Article 75 Information-Sharing Plans

Key Takeaways

• AMLA Executive Board Member Rikke-Louise Petersen used a keynote at the Nordic Financial Crime & Sanctions Forum to preview how risk analysis, financial intelligence, and supervision will be integrated at the European level.
• Two milestones stand out: the first joint FIU analysis exercise expected toward the end of 2026, and the information-sharing partnerships that Article 75 of the AML Regulation will enable from July 2027.
• Compliance teams should treat the speech as an early signal of supervisory priorities and data expectations.

Deep Dive

AMLA Executive Board Member Rikke-Louise Petersen used a keynote at the Nordic Financial Crime & Sanctions Forum to preview how risk analysis, financial intelligence, and supervision will be integrated at the European level. Two milestones stand out: the first joint FIU analysis exercise expected toward the end of 2026, and the information-sharing partnerships that Article 75 of the AML Regulation will enable from July 2027. Compliance teams should treat the speech as an early signal of supervisory priorities and data expectations.

Two timelines were mentioned. First, AMLA's first joint analysis exercise among FIUs is planned toward the end of 2026. The speech gave no detail on scope, but it is likely to produce cross-border typologies and risk indicators that feed supervisory expectations and FIU feedback. Second, Article 75 of the Anti-Money Laundering Regulation will enable information-sharing partnerships from July 2027. This points to a future in which private-sector entities and authorities exchange information more systematically, which raises governance questions on data protection, legal basis, confidentiality, and tipping-off.

Petersen also stressed that bringing AML/CFT supervision and FIU coordination together in one authority allows each function to inform the other while remaining distinct. In practice, intelligence insights may increasingly shape supervisory focus areas, and supervisory findings may shape intelligence priorities. Firms should expect that the quality and consistency of their suspicious transaction reporting may be viewed as an indicator of the strength of their overall AML/CFT controls. No new obligations were announced, and the speech does not confirm how the distinct functions will be separated operationally.

Recommended actions:
- Review enterprise-wide risk assessments for cross-border exposure, and align them with emerging EU-level typologies.
- Assess the quality, timeliness, and consistency of suspicious activity reporting across jurisdictions.
- Begin scoping governance, legal, and data-protection frameworks for Article 75 information-sharing participation ahead of July 2027.
- Monitor AMLA publications, including the full speech and any outputs from the joint FIU analysis, for indicators relevant to your business lines.
- Brief senior management and the board on the shift toward a more integrated, intelligence-led European supervisory model.

Impact is moderate and forward-looking. Near-term risk is low because no obligations were created, but firms with weak cross-border data consistency or reporting quality may face greater exposure as AMLA's analytical and supervisory capabilities mature.

Source: AMLA - Anti-Money Laundering Authority