Find the Right GRC Solution

Search and compare GRC technology built for the problems you’re trying to solve

ASIC Form 5111 Requires Responsible Entities to Lodge Compliance Plan Audit Reports for Registered S

ASIC Form 5111 Requires Responsible Entities to Lodge Compliance Plan Audit Reports for Registered S

By
Regulatory data powered by Corlytics
ASIC's Form 5111 is the mechanism through which responsible entities of registered managed investment schemes lodge their annual compliance plan audit reports…
🔒
Cancel anytime
Full archive access
Custom alerts
Key Takeaways
  • ASIC's Form 5111 is the mechanism through which responsible entities of registered managed investment schemes lodge their annual compliance plan audit reports under s601HG(7) of the Corporations Act 2001.
  • The form discloses whether the auditor issued a qualified opinion on compliance plan adherence or on the plan's adequacy.
  • Compliance teams must meet the three-month lodgement deadline to avoid late fees and regulatory scrutiny.
  • Note that this is a form and guide, not a new rule.
Deep Dive

ASIC's Form 5111 is the mechanism through which responsible entities of registered managed investment schemes lodge their annual compliance plan audit reports under s601HG(7) of the Corporations Act 2001. The form discloses whether the auditor issued a qualified opinion on compliance plan adherence or on the plan's adequacy. Compliance teams must meet the three-month lodgement deadline to avoid late fees and regulatory scrutiny. Note that this is a form and guide, not a new rule. The content is dated 2011 and 2018, even though the listing shows a 2026 date, so teams should confirm that no substantive change is being introduced.

Form 5111 requires the responsible entity of a registered scheme to report on the outcome of its annual compliance plan audit. The form captures scheme details (name and ARSN), responsible entity details (name and ACN), the financial year-end, and the current compliance plan auditor's details, including registration number. Section 2 asks two yes/no questions: whether the auditor's s601HG(3) report contains a qualified opinion that (a) the responsible entity did not comply with the compliance plan during the year, or (b) the compliance plan does not meet the requirements of Part 5C.4 of the Corporations Act. A copy of the full audit report must be attached.

Key procedural requirements come from the accompanying guide. A director or secretary of the responsible entity must sign the form. Lodgement is due within 3 months after the end of the financial year, so a 30 June year-end implies a 30 September deadline. Late fees apply when lodgement falls outside this period. Any annexures must meet formatting requirements: A4 paper, scheme name and ARSN shown, consecutive page numbering, an identifying mark, the prescribed endorsement wording, and signature and date by the same signatory as the form. The guide also points to ASIC Information Release IR00/12 on auditing compliance plans of managed investment schemes.

The document contains no new obligations. The form is dated 17 January 2011 and the guide 4 July 2018, so the 2026 date likely reflects a republication or website update. Compliance teams should check the current ASIC forms page to confirm the version in use, since lodgement channels (for example, electronic lodgement versus the postal address given) may have changed.

Recommended actions:
- Build the lodgement deadline into the compliance calendar for each registered scheme.
- Confirm that the audit engagement timeline allows the s601HG(3) report to be finalized well before the deadline.
- Establish internal sign-off by a director or secretary, with review of the auditor details and the accuracy of the qualified-opinion responses.
- Verify that annexures meet the formatting rules.
- Escalate any qualified opinion to the board and compliance committee, and prepare for possible ASIC inquiries.

Risk implications: Late or inaccurate lodgement exposes the responsible entity to late fees and potential regulatory action. A "Yes" response to either question signals a compliance plan breach or a deficient plan, which may trigger breach reporting analysis, remediation obligations, and reputational impact. Overall the operational burden is low, but the consequences of weak controls are significant for scheme governance.

Source: Australian Securities and Investments Commission

Oops! Something went wrong