Korea’s Privacy Regulator Pivots Toward Prevention as AI Reshapes the Data Landscape

Key Takeaways

• From Punishment to Prevention: Korea’s privacy regulator plans to move away from a system dominated by ex-post sanctions toward earlier intervention, continuous oversight, and risk-based supervision.
• Sharper Enforcement Where It Counts: Recurring or large-scale data breaches could face tougher punitive penalties, while class actions would be expanded to include compensatory damages for affected individuals.
• AI Governance Takes Center Stage: New rules will support safer AI data use, expanded lawful processing bases, and wider use of pseudonymized data, backed by guidance for advanced and agentic AI systems.
• Everyday Privacy Comes Into Focus: Measures target consumer-facing risks, including certified IP cameras, smart devices, deepfakes, youth data protection, and early breach-alert mechanisms.
• Cross-Border Data Scrutiny Increases: Impact assessments, merger-related transfer reviews, and expanded use of SCCs and BCRs signal tighter oversight of international data flows as Korea seeks a bigger role in global privacy norms.

Deep Dive

The Personal Information Protection Commission (PIPC) recently unveiled its policy directions for 2026, laying out a sweeping plan to move Korea’s privacy regime away from after-the-fact penalties and toward a more preventive, risk-based approach designed for an AI-embedded society. The roadmap was presented on December 2 at the Sejong Convention Center during a joint reporting session with the Ministry of Science and ICT, the Korea Aerospace Administration, and the Korea Media and Communications Commission.

At its core, the plan reflects a recognition that the traditional model of privacy regulation, focused heavily on regulating data collection and imposing sanctions after breaches occur, is struggling to keep pace with rapid advances in AI, cloud computing, and cross-border data flows. In recent years, a series of large-scale breaches in sectors such as communications and logistics has underscored those limits.

Rather than doubling down on ex-post enforcement alone, the PIPC says it intends to fundamentally reshape the privacy framework itself.

Tougher Consequences, Earlier Intervention

Enforcement is still very much part of the picture, but the Commission is aiming to make it more targeted and consequential. Under the 2026 agenda, the PIPC plans to introduce special cases for punitive penalties in situations involving recurring or large-scale data breaches, a move intended to strengthen deterrence where systemic failures persist.

The regulator also plans to make it easier for affected individuals to seek meaningful redress. Compensatory damages would be folded into the requirements for class actions, a change designed to move beyond symbolic penalties and toward practical remedies for people harmed by breaches.

At the same time, the PIPC is tightening oversight of Korea’s ISMS-P certification scheme. Proposed changes include a new preliminary review process and more rigorous on-site demonstrations. In cases of repeated or severe incidents, certifications could be revoked in principle, reinforcing the idea that compliance is an ongoing obligation rather than a box to be checked once.

To complement enforcement, the Commission said it will introduce incentives to encourage businesses to invest more heavily in privacy protection, while tailoring obligations to an organization’s size and risk profile. Companies handling large volumes of personal or sensitive data will also be required to report their Chief Privacy Officer designation to the PIPC.

Watching Risks Before They Become Breaches

A defining feature of the 2026 roadmap is its emphasis on prevention. The PIPC plans to conduct targeted examinations of sectors that process vast amounts of personal data, including logistics and platform businesses, while standing up a new Technical Analysis Center to continuously assess emerging threats and vulnerabilities.

Public-sector systems will face closer scrutiny as well. The Commission said penalties tied to public-sector privacy assessments will become stricter, alongside stronger obligations to identify and address security weaknesses in major government data processing systems.

Notably, the regulator is also carving out space for support rather than punishment. Start-ups, small and medium-sized enterprises, and microbusinesses will be eligible for assistance programs that include technical guidance, pre-emptive monitoring, and reduced administrative sanctions when corrective actions are taken quickly.

The PIPC also sees privacy-enhancing technologies as a cornerstone of this preventive approach. It plans to expand R&D and professional training around tools such as pseudonymization, anonymization, homomorphic encryption, synthetic data, and distributed computing. These technologies, the Commission said, are essential to enabling data use in AI systems while minimizing privacy risks across the AI lifecycle.

Governing Data Use in the Age of AI

As AI systems grow more advanced, including the rise of agentic AI, the PIPC is preparing new rules to clarify how personal data can be used safely. The Commission plans to introduce special cases for AI data processing that expand lawful bases for processing and promote the responsible use of pseudonymized data.

To address capacity gaps, especially in the public sector, the PIPC will operate a One-Stop Support System for Pseudonymization, linked to the Personal Information Innovation Zone. The zone already allows researchers and start-ups to use personal data more flexibly within a controlled environment, and the new hub is intended to reduce friction in data flows without lowering safeguards.

New AI-specific data processing guidelines are also in development, backed by a Public-Private Policy Advisory Council for AI Privacy. In parallel, the PIPC’s Public AX Innovation Help Desk will support AI projects aimed at solving social problems while managing privacy risks from the outset.

The MyData Initiative remains another key plank. After expanding into healthcare and communications in 2025, the framework will extend in 2026 to areas such as energy, education, employment, culture, and leisure, giving individuals greater control over how their personal data is shared and reused.

Making Privacy Visible in Everyday Life

The Commission’s plans are not limited to enterprise systems and AI models. A significant portion of the 2026 agenda focuses on privacy issues people encounter in daily life.

The PIPC plans to mandate the use of security-certified IP cameras in major facilities and push for legislation governing image information processing devices. It also intends to reinvigorate its Privacy by Design certification scheme, with a sharper focus on consumer technologies such as robotic vacuum cleaners and kiosks.

The regulator is also preparing to address harms linked to synthetic content and deepfake-enabled crimes, working within a broader government cooperation framework. Youth privacy remains a priority as well, with the continued operation of the Erasure Service, which allows individuals to delete content posted when they were minors.

Meanwhile, the Data Breach Report Center will be expanded to include consultation services and early-warning alerts, enabling individuals to take action sooner when their data may be at risk. To tackle illicit data circulation, the PIPC plans to strengthen legal bases for enforcement and formalize inter-agency and international cooperation.

A new Redress Support Fund will be created to channel penalties collected under the Personal Information Protection Act into relief for affected individuals. The Commission also plans to introduce a Consent-Resolution Scheme, allowing businesses to propose voluntary correction and compensation measures following incidents.

Cross-Border Data and Global Standards

With international data transfers continuing to grow, the PIPC is sharpening its cross-border oversight. The Commission will promote the use of its Standard Contractual Clauses and Binding Corporate Rules, while introducing impact assessments for large-scale transfers and prior assessments tied to mergers and acquisitions.

Beyond Korea’s borders, the regulator plans to deepen cooperation with jurisdictions such as the United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan, while playing a more active role in shaping global privacy norms.

PIPC Chairperson Kyung Hee Song said the shift is unavoidable. “Amid the fast-evolving data protection and privacy landscape, the existing ex-post sanction system is no longer feasible,” she said, adding that the Commission intends to “fundamentally transform” Korea’s privacy framework to support an AI-embedded society that remains safe and trustworthy for the public.

The GRC Report is your premier destination for the latest in governance, risk, and compliance news. As your reliable source for comprehensive coverage, we ensure you stay informed and ready to navigate the dynamic landscape of GRC. Beyond being a news source, the GRC Report represents a thriving community of professionals who, like you, are dedicated to GRC excellence. Explore our insightful articles and breaking news, and actively participate in the conversation to enhance your GRC journey.