MAS Reports on Governance & Risk Management in Commodity Financing

Key Takeaways

• Commodity Financing Risks: Singapore’s banks face heightened risks in the commodity financing sector, which involves volatile commodity prices, large transaction volumes, and cross-border trade complexities.
• MAS 2024 Inspections: The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) conducted inspections of banks providing commodity financing, particularly in oil and gas, revealing both positive findings and areas for improvement.
• Governance and Oversight Gaps: MAS found that many banks lack clear roles and responsibilities across departments, resulting in inconsistent risk management practices and control gaps.
• Improvement Needed in Fraud Risk Monitoring: MAS recommended that banks enhance their credit risk assessments and adopt more thorough, structured approaches to detecting fraud.
• Transactional Control Weaknesses: Banks are encouraged to improve post-transaction tracking and reporting of anomalies, with MAS identifying gaps in structured monitoring that could help detect risky behavior earlier.

Deep Dive

In Singapore, the commodity financing (CF) sector plays a pivotal role in connecting global trade to the world’s financial systems. As one of the world’s key trading hubs, Singapore’s banks are responsible for financing the flow of commodities that power economies from oil and gas to metals and beyond. However, as the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) pointed out in its recent 2024 inspection report, the sheer scale and complexity of commodity trade financing means that banks are facing heightened risks that need more than just a cursory glance.

Commodity financing brings with it a unique set of challenges. Banks don’t just have to worry about the typical financial risks—they also have to contend with the inherent volatility in commodity prices, large transaction volumes, and the messy business of cross-border trade, where multiple players are involved. From buyers and sellers to storage operators and intermediaries, the web of relationships makes risk management anything but straightforward.

On top of that, the potential for money laundering remains a significant concern. As financial flows become more complex and opaque, banks must be vigilant in their monitoring practices. The need for robust governance and risk management has never been more critical.

What MAS Found in Their 2024 Inspections
To dig deeper into how well banks are managing these risks, MAS conducted thematic inspections on selected banks that provide commodity financing, particularly in the oil and gas sector. What they found was encouraging, but also revealed a number of areas where banks could— and should—do better:

1. Governance and Oversight: MAS observed that banks have established governance frameworks to monitor their commodity financing activities. But here’s where things get a bit murky: in many cases, there was a lack of clear roles and responsibilities across different business units. When different departments are handling commodity financing under separate umbrellas, it can result in inconsistent application of standards and, as MAS pointed out, control gaps. Banks need a more unified approach to managing these risks, one that spans the entire organization and encourages more transparent oversight at every level.
2. Customer-Level Controls and Risk Monitoring: On the customer-side, banks have made strides in improving their credit risk assessment processes. Still, there’s room to grow—particularly when it comes to assessing the risk of fraud. Fraudulent activity can often slip under the radar when not enough emphasis is placed on structured, thorough assessments. MAS recommended that banks take a deeper, more holistic approach to their due diligence, ensuring that their credit approval and monitoring processes leave no stone unturned.
3. Transactional Control and Monitoring: As any seasoned risk manager will tell you, it’s all about the details. Banks have put in place measures to monitor compliance with trade conditions, but when it comes to post-transaction reviews and reporting on trade anomalies, there’s definitely room for improvement. MAS found that many banks didn’t track trade exceptions and anomalies in a structured way, which means they might miss critical warning signs of fraud or risky behavior. It’s clear that these banks could benefit from better tracking and reporting frameworks that would allow them to catch potential issues earlier.
4. The Tech and Tools Gap: Another eye-opening finding: not all banks are leveraging technology to its full potential. Given the vast amount of data involved in commodity financing, it’s surprising that some banks are still using outdated systems that can’t keep up with the complexities of the trade. This is where data analytics and network tools come into play. By investing in better systems to track transactions and analyze patterns, banks could improve their ability to spot risky behavior and take action before things spiral out of control.

In light of these findings, MAS has issued a set of supervisory expectations designed to guide banks in refining their risk management practices. Banks are urged to benchmark their operations against these expectations and implement necessary changes to ensure they are operating at a higher standard of oversight and control.

The MAS report made it clear that the commodity financing space is too important to be left to chance. Banks must not only meet industry standards but exceed them. Strengthening credit monitoring, improving the transparency of risk management processes, and embracing the latest technology are not optional—they are essential for staying ahead of the curve.

The Challenge of Staying Ahead
Commodity financing might be one of the more complex areas of banking, but it’s also one of the most critical to Singapore’s role as a global trade hub. As the MAS report suggests, banks are doing a lot right—but there’s still much to be done to close the gaps in governance, fraud prevention, and risk monitoring. In a world where market dynamics change overnight and fraudsters are always innovating, banks must be equally proactive. The onus is on them to strengthen their systems, sharpen their processes, and keep up with the pace of change.

The next few years will be crucial for banks operating in this space. The tools and practices they implement now will determine whether they can continue to thrive in a fast-moving, high-stakes environment. And as MAS’s report makes clear, there’s no room for complacency.

The GRC Report is your premier destination for the latest in governance, risk, and compliance news. As your reliable source for comprehensive coverage, we ensure you stay informed and ready to navigate the dynamic landscape of GRC. Beyond being a news source, the GRC Report represents a thriving community of professionals who, like you, are dedicated to GRC excellence. Explore our insightful articles and breaking news, and actively participate in the conversation to enhance your GRC journey.