Norway FSA Republishes French AMF Warning on Impersonation Site blockchain-support.fr

Key Takeaways

• The Norway Financial Supervisory Authority (Finanstilsynet) has published a warning about blockchain-support.fr, a website that the French Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) has listed on its blacklist of impersonation (usurpation) sites.
• Compliance teams should treat the domain as a likely fraud vector, block it, and use it to strengthen customer-protection and fraud-prevention controls.

Deep Dive

The Norway Financial Supervisory Authority (Finanstilsynet) has published a warning about blockchain-support.fr, a website that the French Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) has listed on its blacklist of impersonation (usurpation) sites. Compliance teams should treat the domain as a likely fraud vector, block it, and use it to strengthen customer-protection and fraud-prevention controls.

The warning creates no formal requirements and sets no deadlines. The date shown is 2026-09-15, and the warning should be treated as effective immediately. Even so, regulated firms are expected to maintain effective controls against fraud, financial crime, and misleading conduct. Indicators of this kind feed directly into transaction monitoring, customer-protection, and threat-intelligence processes. Firms that offer crypto-asset services or hold customer wallets are especially exposed because impersonated "support" channels are often used to obtain seed phrases, credentials, or remote-access permissions.

Recommended actions include the following:
- Add the domain to web, email, and DNS blocklists, and to internal threat-intelligence feeds.
- Search logs, customer complaints, and call-center records for contact with the domain.
- Review recent outbound payments, especially to crypto exchanges or wallets, for victims of impersonation fraud.
- File suspicious activity reports where warranted.
- Update customer warnings and fraud-awareness messaging, and make sure front-line staff can recognize "blockchain support" impersonation scenarios.
- Confirm that the brand-protection and takedown processes cover similar lookalike domains.

The direct impact on regulated firms is low, but the risk is meaningful for retail customers and for firms whose names or services could be impersonated. The main risks are customer financial loss, reputational damage, complaint volumes, and possible exposure under fraud-reimbursement or conduct expectations. Repeated warnings from European authorities about similar domains point to continued regulatory attention on online scams, so teams should record the actions taken in response as evidence of effective controls.

Source: Norway Financial Supervisory Authority