Find the Right GRC Solution

Search and compare GRC technology built for the problems you’re trying to solve

OCC Amends 12 CFR Part 4 Examination Frequency Rules for National Banks and Federal Branches

OCC Amends 12 CFR Part 4 Examination Frequency Rules for National Banks and Federal Branches

By
Regulatory data powered by Corlytics
The OCC's September 14, 2026 update to 12 CFR Part 4 (91 FR 58014) amends §§ 4.6 and 4.7, which govern how often national banks, Federal savings associations,…
🔒
Cancel anytime
Full archive access
Custom alerts
Key Takeaways
  • The OCC's September 14, 2026 update to 12 CFR Part 4 (91 FR 58014) amends §§ 4.6 and 4.7, which govern how often national banks, Federal savings associations, and Federal branches and agencies receive full-scope, on-site examinations.
  • The remainder of the text provided is largely organizational and procedural, but the examination cycle provisions directly affect supervisory planning and readiness for institutions near the 18-month eligibility thresholds.
Deep Dive

The OCC's September 14, 2026 update to 12 CFR Part 4 (91 FR 58014) amends §§ 4.6 and 4.7, which govern how often national banks, Federal savings associations, and Federal branches and agencies receive full-scope, on-site examinations. The remainder of the text provided is largely organizational and procedural, but the examination cycle provisions directly affect supervisory planning and readiness for institutions near the 18-month eligibility thresholds.

The only provisions in the text carrying a September 14, 2026 amendment citation are § 4.6 (national banks and Federal savings associations) and § 4.7 (Federal agencies and branches). The excerpt does not say what changed. The text shown still contains a USD $6 Billion total asset threshold, legacy references to the OTS, and transitional paragraphs (d) tied to December 31, 2021 and Call Report data as of December 31, 2019. Compliance teams should therefore pull the full text of 91 FR 58014 and compare it against the prior version before drawing conclusions. A separate amendment at 91 FR 56021 (September 1, 2026) is also cross-referenced and should be reviewed.

The baseline requirements in the text are a full-scope, on-site examination at least every 12 months. An 18-month cycle is available if the institution meets several conditions. For banks and savings associations, these are total assets under USD $6 Billion, well-capitalized status under 12 CFR Part 6, composite and management ratings of 1 or 2, no formal enforcement action, and no change in control in the prior 12 months. For Federal branches and agencies, the conditions are total assets under USD $6 Billion, a composite ROCA rating of 1 or 2, a capital equivalency or a 108 percent eligible assets test, no formal enforcement action, and no change in control. The OCC may also consider discretionary factors such as ROCA component ratings of 3 or worse, off-site deterioration, and the office's importance within the foreign bank's U.S. operations. The OCC retains authority to examine more frequently at any time.

The remaining sections are not substantively new on their face. They cover OCC organization, district office geography, service of process (only OCC Washington headquarters accepts service, and the OCC is not an agent for service on supervised institutions), and FOIA procedures. Key FOIA points are the nine exemptions, including Exemption 8 for examination and condition reports, the predisclosure notice process for confidential commercial information, and public inspection categories. The text is truncated in § 4.14(c), so later subparts (contracting outreach, post-employment restrictions for senior examiners) were not reviewed.

Recommended actions:
- Obtain and analyze the full 91 FR 58014 amendment and identify the effective date and any changes to eligibility criteria.
- Reassess whether each legal entity qualifies for the 12-month or 18-month cycle, and update exam calendars and readiness plans.
- Confirm that capital, ratings, enforcement, and change-in-control monitoring supports eligibility determinations.
- Verify that legal and litigation teams follow the service of process rules.
- Review FOIA confidentiality marking practices for submissions to the OCC.

Risk implications are moderate. A shift in exam frequency changes supervisory touchpoints, resource demands, and the timing of ratings-driven findings. Institutions near the USD $6 Billion threshold or with deteriorating ratings are most exposed to losing 18-month eligibility.

Source: Office of the Comptroller of the Currency

Oops! Something went wrong