SEC Authorizes Transfer of Remaining Distribution Funds for Wedbush Securities, Inc.
Key Takeaways
- The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has approved the final accounting and termination of the distribution fund related to a 2019 enforcement action against Wedbush Securities, Inc.
- This order authorizes the transfer of all remaining, unreturned funds from the distribution pool to the U.S.
- Treasury.
Deep Dive
This regulatory update marks the formal conclusion of the administrative proceedings initiated in September 2019 regarding Wedbush Securities, Inc. The original enforcement action was part of the SEC's Share Class Selection Disclosure Initiative, which addressed conflicts of interest related to the receipt of 12b-1 fees and the selection of higher-cost share classes. For compliance teams, this signifies the end of the firm's responsibility for administering the specific distribution fund established by the previous Order.
The primary requirement of this new Order is the transfer of all remaining funds in the Distribution Fund—specifically USD $83,594.75 consisting of uncashed checks and de minimis amounts—to the U.S. Department of the Treasury. The SEC has reviewed and approved the final accounting submitted by the Respondent, effectively terminating the fund's existence. This means the firm is no longer required to maintain active administration of this specific remedial sanction.
While this particular update is a concluding administrative matter rather than a new regulatory mandate, it highlights the importance of thorough remediation processes. The record shows that out of an initial USD $1,852,540.97 in disgorgement and interest, approximately 96% was successfully disbursed to recipients. Compliance professionals should note that the SEC expects rigorous tracking and reporting during the lifecycle of any court-ordered or administrative distribution fund.
For compliance professionals at similar institutions, the recommended action is to review past remediation projects to ensure all final accountings and reporting obligations are met according to regulatory timelines. The risk implication here is operational; failure to properly manage and report on the disbursement of disgorgement funds can lead to extended oversight and additional administrative burdens. This case serves as a reminder that the compliance lifecycle extends far beyond the initial settlement through the successful completion of all remedial sanctions.

