FTC Settlement Forces Redfin Back Into Rental Listings Market

Key Takeaways

• FTC Settlement Reverses Zillow-Redfin Deal: The proposed order would dismantle key provisions of the companies’ 2025 agreement, which the FTC alleged unlawfully removed Redfin as an independent competitor in rental listing services.
• Redfin Must Return to the Market: Redfin has committed to restart its internet listing services rental advertising business within six months after the order becomes final and make substantial investments in rebuilding it.
• Zillow Must Help Restore Competition: The order requires Zillow to remove barriers affecting Redfin’s recruitment and give certain customers greater flexibility to renegotiate contracts after Redfin relaunches.
• Compliance Comes With Enforcement Teeth: Redfin faces monetary penalties if it fails to meet its commitments, while both companies will be subject to a 10-year order and notification requirements for certain future syndication agreements.

Deep Dive

The Federal Trade Commission and five states have reached a proposed settlement with Zillow and Redfin that would dismantle certain provisions of their 2025 agreement and require Redfin to rebuild the rental advertising business it abandoned. Redfin would have six months after the order becomes final to reenter the market for internet listing services, the websites through which renters search for apartments and property managers advertise them.

The settlement would resolve litigation the FTC brought last September over a February 2025 agreement between the companies. Virginia and the states of Arizona, Connecticut, New York and Washington filed a similar complaint shortly afterward, and the cases were consolidated in November.

Before the agreement, Zillow and Redfin operated two of the country's largest rental listing networks. Zillow's included Zillow Rentals, Trulia and HotPads. Redfin owned Rent.com and ApartmentGuide.com. They competed for the property managers who paid to advertise multifamily rentals and, in doing so, helped determine what renters encountered when they went looking for a home.

Then came the $100 million. Under the agreement challenged by regulators, Zillow paid that sum to Redfin, which agreed to wind down its rental advertising business, terminate contracts with its customers and help move them to Zillow. Redfin's sites would carry listings supplied by Zillow rather than independently competing for them, and Redfin agreed to remain outside the ILS market for as long as nine years.

The FTC alleged that the arrangement dismantled Redfin as a competitor and further concentrated a market that was already concentrated. Daniel Guarnera, director of the agency's Bureau of Competition, put the government's view more plainly Monday, saying Zillow had paid Redfin "$100 million to stop competing and hand off all its customers to Zillow."

The proposed settlement does not merely strike those restrictions from the contract. It attempts the harder thing: rebuilding the competition that regulators say the contract removed.

Redfin must restart its rental advertising business within six months of the order becoming final, including rebuilding the technology needed to place customers' listings across its rental websites. It has committed to hiring a general manager, sales staff and a fully trained customer-support team, and to advertising the relaunched business. The company has also made a multiyear commitment to operate it and to spend millions of dollars growing it, with substantial investment continuing for years.

There is a peculiar difficulty in antitrust remedies of this kind. Removing a restraint is one thing. Restoring the rival that existed before it is another. Customers have moved. Employees have moved. Technology has to be rebuilt. A business that once had its own momentum cannot simply be switched back on because a court order says that it may compete again.

The proposed settlement is unusually attentive to that problem.

Redfin will continue to carry Zillow's listings, but without the restrictions that the FTC said prevented it from fighting for additional business of its own. The agency says that will allow Redfin to return with significantly more listings than it had before the 2025 agreement, giving the rebuilt operation something closer to a running start.

Zillow, meanwhile, would have to help loosen the hold that the intervening period may have created over employees and customers. It must provide employee information so Redfin can interview Zillow workers and waive noncompete, anti-poaching and other restrictions that could keep those employees from taking jobs with Redfin. Zillow would also be prohibited from interfering with Redfin's efforts to recruit and retain them.

Customers get an opening of their own. For nine months after Redfin relaunches, Zillow must allow ILS customers whose contracts cannot be canceled within three months to renegotiate those agreements without cost or penalty. Zillow must notify customers of that flexibility soon after Redfin returns and cannot otherwise prevent or impede them from contracting with Redfin.

Those provisions matter because a competitor without customers is mostly a name on a website. The settlement is structured to give Redfin not only the legal right to return but a plausible opportunity to win business once it does.

That obligation comes with consequences. Redfin faces monetary penalties if it fails to restart its ILS operation within the prescribed timeframes and must provide regular compliance updates to the FTC. The order would remain in force for 10 years.

The companies would also face scrutiny if they attempt something similar again. Zillow and Redfin must notify the FTC before entering into any future syndication agreement involving multifamily rental properties that restricts either company's ability to compete for ILS customers.

The settlement still leaves the two companies commercially connected. Redfin will continue syndicating Zillow listings even as it resumes competing against Zillow for advertising customers. What changes is the boundary around that relationship. The FTC's order is designed to prevent syndication from becoming a mechanism through which one company buys peace from the other.

For property managers, the agency expects Redfin's return to restore another meaningful choice for where to advertise rentals. For renters, the theory is more indirect but no less important: competition between the platforms should put pressure on costs while giving both companies reason to improve the services through which people search for housing.

Whether the rebuilt Redfin becomes the competitor regulators envision will depend on what happens after the legal work is finished. The order can require engineers to rebuild infrastructure, salespeople to be hired and millions of dollars to be spent. It can reopen contracts and remove barriers to recruiting. It cannot manufacture rivalry by decree.

That part Redfin will have to do itself. The settlement gives it six months to get back into the market, several years of investment commitments to make the return credible, and freedom to compete for business that the FTC says it should never have agreed to surrender.

The GRC Report is your premier destination for the latest in governance, risk, and compliance news. As your reliable source for comprehensive coverage, we ensure you stay informed and ready to navigate the dynamic landscape of GRC. Beyond being a news source, the GRC Report represents a thriving community of professionals who, like you, are dedicated to GRC excellence. Explore our insightful articles and breaking news, and actively participate in the conversation to enhance your GRC journey.